I now have an excess of Straight Flush radars. I intend re-role three as mobile artillery locating radar.
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Pz gen |
Straight Flush radar |
Lead | ||
|
I now have an excess of Straight Flush radars. I intend re-role three as mobile artillery locating radar.
Last Edited By: Pz gen 05/18/09 09:40:38.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
FlankerPilot |
#1 | |||
|
Honestly why did even make this vehicle. I mean really. I'd rather have had an SA-6. Or better an SA-11 or SA-15. The first time I saw the TT Straight
Flush in a blister pack for sale I definitely did a double take. I just use mine as a generic air defense radar.
|
||||
|
|
||||
sidekicky |
#2 | |||
|
The Chassis can do a lot of modifications
_________
Sidekicky |
||||
|
|
||||
Randy Schuster |
Radars | #3 | ||
|
SLR-1 Radar, that's kind of funny, because ive got more vehicles then complete vehicles. What one gets is a part off the radar unit, never just the radar
unit and NO vehicle
|
||||
|
|
||||
warmurf2 |
Things will change | #4 | ||
|
Hi all,
China's the next super power. There it is... How will the US respond? Will it be like the EU? Not enough power of it's own but in cahoots with someone else a power to be dealt with? Things will be different. What will our world be like? Will it be return to the cold war principles? One Abram will be worth 3 T72s but in a war of attrition we'll win? Can China colse the technoligy gap quick enough to negate the tech advantages of US equipment now? We've enjoyed great stability thanks to the US since WW2, but I think within 10 years (maybe 5) there will be a new world order. Your thoughts? |
||||
|
|
||||
FlankerPilot |
#5 | |||
|
While China has enormous manpower and materiel reserves, I sincerely doubt they pose any real threat to the US. While they do have some relatively modern
equipment, the quantity they possess it in is rather small. Also, they lack the force multipliers (AWACS, J-STARS, refueling planes) that give US forces an
advantage and also lack any real power projection capability on the seas. P And as for an M1 versus a T-72, I'd actually say it's more like 1 Abrams is
worth 8 T-72s. The ratio would shrink if you were talking about T-72s from a GSFG Guards unit in the '80s but that's a different story. As for
China's tanks, they are pretty much all inferior to any contemporary western tank, and the bulk of their holdings and reserves are almost antiques,
inferior even to a first generation T-72. As for the technology gap, they are closing it by a little bit, but keep in mind that for every new weapon system the
US rolls out, there's one in the works that is a generation/generation and a half ahead of it.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Randy Schuster |
Your both wrong | #6 | ||
|
The power in hand these days is India, Both have a large land force, but India frields better ground vehicles, plus India has a blue water Navy which China is
still starting out with.
Who own's the Indian Ocean. In 10 to 15 years the Chinese can say we own the China Sea abd the Sea of Japan |
||||
|
|
||||
Pz gen |
China | #7 | ||
|
Given that China has huge financial investments in the USA why would it force a war?
|
||||
|
|
||||